Bug #5727
closed
Crystal with more than 2 carriers
Added by Ralet Damian over 11 years ago. Updated over 11 years ago.
0%
Description
We managed to have 3 carriers in the configuration for one crystal.
It will be nice to rise an error when a crystal have more than two carrier (one slave and one master)
Updated by Grave Xavier over 11 years ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
- Assigned To changed from Grave Xavier to Legay Eric
code check was done : it should be impossible to have more than two carriers (still need to check master/slave).
Do you remember how you arrived to this situation in the DB ?
Updated by Legay Eric over 11 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Assigned
It was somthing like this ...
Crytal 1 :
<devices> <relation name_origin="C007" name_destination="carrier-042" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="CARRIER"></relation> <relation name_origin="carrier-042" name_destination="seg-0033" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-042" name_destination="seg-0016" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-042" name_destination="seg-0055" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="C007" name_destination="carrier-030" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="CARRIER"></relation> <relation name_origin="carrier-030" name_destination="seg-0022" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-030" name_destination="seg-0018" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-030" name_destination="seg-0067" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-030" name_destination="seg-0029" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="C007" name_destination="gts-011" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="GTS"></relation> <relation name_origin="C007" name_destination="anode10" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="NARVAL_NODE"></relation> <relation name_origin="C007" name_destination="digitizer019" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="DIGITIZER"></relation> </devices>
Crystal 2 :
<devices> <relation name_origin="C005" name_destination="carrier-025" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="CARRIER"></relation> <relation name_origin="carrier-025" name_destination="seg-0036" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-025" name_destination="seg-0083" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-025" name_destination="seg-0072" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="C007" name_destination="carrier-027" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="CARRIER"></relation> <relation name_origin="carrier-027" name_destination="seg-0107" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-027" name_destination="seg-0171" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-027" name_destination="seg-0039" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="carrier-027" name_destination="seg-0051" type_origin="CARRIER" type_destination="MEZZANINE"/> <relation name_origin="C005" name_destination="gts-015" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="GTS"></relation> <relation name_origin="C005" name_destination="anode13" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="NARVAL_NODE"></relation> <relation name_origin="C005" name_destination="digitizer037" type_origin="CRYSTAL" type_destination="DIGITIZER"></relation> </devices>
Updated by Legay Eric over 11 years ago
- Assigned To changed from Legay Eric to Grave Xavier
Xavier Grave wrote:
code check was done : it should be impossible to have more than two carriers (still need to check master/slave).
Do you remember how you arrived to this situation in the DB ?
Updated by Grave Xavier over 11 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Feedback
- Assigned To changed from Grave Xavier to Legay Eric
I have checked fill_db_from_xml code
it doesn't use the soap interface to fill the base
Proposition => study if we can only use the soap interface to fill relations ?
Updated by Grave Xavier over 11 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
fill db from file :
- fill directly the database for std items
- use soap interface Add_Relation
Add_Relation maintain a model view of the base and do the check
see 248:fcc95a312020 of topology-manager repository