Project

General

Profile

Acceptance criteria » DE-CH_feedback_acceptance_criteria.txt

Acceptance criteria from DE-CH - Cordier Hélène, 01/26/2010 10:58 AM

 
1
Dear All,
2
 
3
I don't know which is the correct channel to report the Dashboard Nagios issue. As many of you have done I also send our feedback here again to avoid missing. Excuse me if you receive twice.
4
 
5
although it is late, Our ROD DECH would like to send feedback to the validation
6
process described in this page:
7
https://forge.in2p3.fr/wiki/opsportaluser/Acceptance_criteria <https://owa.fzk.de/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=https://forge.in2p3.fr/wiki/opsportaluser/Acceptance_criteria> 
8
see attached file.
9
 
10
Our ROD shifters tried to compare new nagios dashboard with old one, based on sam. But
11
it is not realy possible, because the new dashboard does'nt display
12
correct information about alarms and tickets. (the dashboard test version is running using the CERN regional-nagios new installation, right?) Following is the detailed information:
13
*** 
14
1 site BMRW-FRANKFURT
15
Dashboard-nagios                        
16
Alarm:
17
Test:org.sam.WN-Csh-ops on
18
On: ce-enmr.chemie.uni-frankfurt.de         
19

    
20
Dashboard- SAM
21
it's a WN test not exist in SAM so no alarm
22

    
23
***
24
2. site DESY-ZN
25
Dashboard-nagios
26
No alarm on dashboard, but nagios display the reference tests crital
27

    
28
Dashboard-SAM
29
3 alarms match the SAM results
30

    
31
***
32
3. site TUDresden-ZIH
33
Dashboard-nagios
34
Alarm:
35
Test: hr.srce.SRM-Transfer-ops
36
On: ophelia.zih.tu-dresden.de
37

    
38
Dashboard-SAM:
39
No alarm because SAM test for this service not exist
40

    
41
*************
42
 Our regional nagios instance status is updated to the latest version. We have just solved the proxy retrieving problem after host certificate updated and Gram command portal problem.  But we have less nodes under monitoring than the cern box, need to investigate. .
43
Regards
44
Wen Mei ROC DECH
(5-5/5)